2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer. (275 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 240 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Trailblazer | Continental |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 284 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3210 mm |