2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer vs. 1972 AC 428
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AC 428 (298 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer. (275 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer weights approximately 726 kg more than 1972 AC 428.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AC 428. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AC 428 (639 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer. (373 Nm). This means 1972 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer | 1972 AC 428 | |
Make | Chevrolet | AC |
Model | Trailblazer | 428 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 7003 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 298 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 639 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 1434 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2450 mm |