2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,198 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer (275 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer weights approximately 940 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer (373 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Trailblazer | 626 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2620 mm |
