2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer vs. 1996 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,198 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer weights approximately 540 kg more than 1996 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer | 1996 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Trailblazer | Cougar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 3798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1860 mm |