2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer would be higher. At 4,198 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer (275 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer weights approximately 677 kg more than 2005 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer (373 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Trailblazer | B3000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 240 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2840 mm |