2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer vs. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer would be higher. At 4,198 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer (275 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. (169 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer (373 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. (217 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Trailblazer | 2011 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Trailblazer | Malibu |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4198 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2852 mm |