2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport | 1962 Renault 8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Trans Sport | 8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2280 mm |