2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport weights approximately 735 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport (285 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Trans Sport | 220 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 183 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2610 mm |