2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport (183 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Trans Sport | 1996 Acura TL | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
| Model | Trans Sport | TL |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3350 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2840 mm |
