2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 1008 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Triax | Elan |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 590 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2140 mm |