2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,269 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 217 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Triax | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 4269 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1815 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2850 mm |