2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1976 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 13 kg more than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1976 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Triax | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 5763 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1585 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2830 mm |
