2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 102 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp | |
Make | Chevrolet | De Tomaso |
Model | Triax | Longchamp |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 5763 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 297 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1700 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2610 mm |