2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1989 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 198 kg more than 1989 Ford Taurus.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1989 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Triax | Taurus |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 2513 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1400 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |
