2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1994 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 208 kg more than 1994 Ford Mustang.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 1994 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1994 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1994 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Triax | Mustang |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 3797 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1390 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2580 mm |