2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 380 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner has manual transmission. 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Triax | Space Runner |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 1834 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1218 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2530 mm |