2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Sentia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Sentia would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 32 kg more than 1996 Mazda Sentia.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Sentia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Triax | Sentia |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 2954 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1566 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |