2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 503 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Triax | 323 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 88 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1095 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2520 mm |