2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 333 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Triax | CLK |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 3199 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 216 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1265 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |
