2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2002 Audi A3
To start off, 2002 Audi A3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 1,967 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 258 kg more than 2002 Audi A3.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2002 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
| Model | Triax | A3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 1967 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1340 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2580 mm |
