2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 4,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 277 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mercedes-Benz S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2003 Mercedes-Benz S | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Triax | S |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 4964 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1875 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2890 mm |
