2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2004 Ford F-250
To start off, 2004 Ford F-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1042 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford F-250 has manual transmission. 2004 Ford F-250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2004 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Triax | F-250 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 5408 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 2640 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3490 mm |
