2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2005 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 28 kg more than 2005 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Jaguar X-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2005 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Triax | X-Type |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 2489 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 194 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1570 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2590 mm |