2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2005 Scion xA
To start off, 2005 Scion xA is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 1,490 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Scion xA is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 537 kg more than 2005 Scion xA.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Scion xA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2005 Scion xA | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Scion |
| Model | Triax | xA |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 1490 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1061 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2380 mm |
