2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2006 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2006 Citroen Xsara is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 374 kg more than 2006 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 2006 Citroen Xsara has manual transmission. 2006 Citroen Xsara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2006 Citroen Xsara | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
| Model | Triax | Xsara |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 1997 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1224 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2550 mm |
