2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2008 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 247 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2008 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Triax | XJR |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 3995 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1845 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2880 mm |
