2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Triax | LR2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 3201 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2670 mm |
