2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2008 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 418 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-7.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda CX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2008 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Triax | CX-7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 244 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1180 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2760 mm |