2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 632 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Triax | E-350 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 5408 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 15 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 966 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3510 mm |