2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Triax | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 5000 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 387 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2838 mm |
