2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2009 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2009 Nissan GT-R is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 3,799 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 44 kg more than 2009 Nissan GT-R.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2009 Nissan GT-R | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Triax | GT-R |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 3799 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 469 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1554 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2790 mm |
