2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 2009 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2009 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Triax | C30 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 2520 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1598 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2650 mm |