2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Triax | UTE |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
