2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2010 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 3,191 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 1110 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2010 Land Rover Freelander | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Triax | Freelander |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 3191 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 2708 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2670 mm |
