2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 443 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Triax | 2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 1596 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1155 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2500 mm |