2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Triax | Falcon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1648 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2838 mm |