2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 385 kg more than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda CR-Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 2012 Honda CR-Z has manual transmission. 2012 Honda CR-Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Triax | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 1500 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1213 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2436 mm |
