2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2012 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Alto is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Alto is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 713 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Alto.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Suzuki Alto. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 2012 Suzuki Alto has manual transmission. 2012 Suzuki Alto will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2012 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Triax | Alto |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 996 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 885 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2360 mm |