2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 323 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Triax | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 325 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1921 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2748 mm |
