2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 314 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
| Model | Triax | XTS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 660 cc | 3564 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1912 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2831 mm |
