2000 Chevrolet Triax vs. 2013 Toyota Tacoma
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tacoma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 2,700 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tacoma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tacoma weights approximately 16 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Tacoma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Triax | 2013 Toyota Tacoma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Triax | Tacoma |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 2700 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1614 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3246 mm |