2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 1968 Mazda R-100

To start off, 2000 Chrysler 300 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 804 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100. 2000 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda R-100 has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda R-100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: