2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 1978 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2000 Chrysler 300 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1978 Ford Mustang. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1978 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 384 kg more than 1978 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Ford Mustang. (192 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications: