2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 1992 Volvo 480

To start off, 2000 Chrysler 300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 480. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 480 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 480. (109 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 480. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 607 kg more than 1992 Volvo 480. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 480, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Volvo 480. (140 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Volvo 480. 2000 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 1992 Volvo 480 has manual transmission. 1992 Volvo 480 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: