2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 1997 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1997 Oldsmobile SS. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1997 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2000 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler 300 | 1997 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 300 | SS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 479 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
