2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (145 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (280 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Rodeo. 2000 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2003 Holden Rodeo has manual transmission. 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler 300 | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 300 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 479 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3060 mm |