2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 1140 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler 300 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Westfield |
Model | 300 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2320 mm |