2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 2005 TVR T 350
To start off, 2005 TVR T 350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 TVR T 350 (347 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 509 kg more than 2005 TVR T 350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 TVR T 350. (393 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 TVR T 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler 300 | 2005 TVR T 350 | |
| Make | Chrysler | TVR |
| Model | 300 | T 350 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 3605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 347 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 479 Nm | 393 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1609 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |
