2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler 300. (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler 300. (255 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler 300 | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
Model | 300 | Stavic |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 84 mm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3010 mm |