2000 Chrysler 300 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (253 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 2000 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler 300 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 300 | Epica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 479 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |